It’s missing the art part

If you reach a certain market power it isn’t so easy anymore.

If you become something like public infrastructure you have to act like one or reduce your importance

But isn’t this the internet censoring a government?

Because the attackers won’t delay their attack when no valuable target is online

Yeah the scheduled time is very weird. Like who's going to come back online at the end of the window?

But"People who work for OAI got fired for using AI to do their job"

That's exctly what happened

It also tops Apple App store. Any similar tidbit about installs being bots for Apple?

don't trust this we've spent hundreds of dollars without any effect whatsoever in the statistics

My point is not the money spend but that bots not only create traffic on web sites but also app stores

Sold for a full price, so it’s a sold product.

Game console dev kits are typically _more_ expensive than the consoles they're for. So "full price" isn't a good argument. (The fact that they were available to the public is a stronger argument.)

i've never had the luxury of buying a cheaper dev kit. Ever.

It wasn't though, a full price would have been more, to cover not just components and assembly but the cost of R&D.

Game console dev kits usually cost more than the consoles they're for, not less. They're not mass produced at the scale that the consoles are, and they're sold or leased to companies expecting to make several orders of magnitude more back off the products they create with the dev kits.

There isn't a very direct comparison of Oculus products to game consoles like PlayStation, Nintendo, XBox, or those in the distant past. It is interesting, and they have a lot of the same market forces at play, but I don't think they behave by the same rules.

There's at least one way where there's a direct comparison: they both have dev kits.

But should you see that if you just use it as as service?

you won't unless you deliberately try to read all that stuff

But should the AI simply obey?

Unless there is a reason not to. Giving the user the contents of their own sandbox is fine if you're supposed to let them run anything in it to complete the requested tasks.

If the only purpose of the sandbox were to isolate the instance of the service the user used then it might be a different expectation.

As a user, yes please.

Did you read all the links?

Google search did the same and more than once the link didn’t contain what I searched for

US hardware with chips made in Taiwan created with European lithography systems?

Chips developed and controlled by the US. Taiwan is controlled by the US. Europe has no leverage.

Europe does not exist in AI. That is the sad truth, no need to try to pick hole in reality... It's quite healthy to listen to EU noise less because otherwise people tend to drink the kool-aid and believe that the EU (and Europe) is anywhere in most strategic developments (AI and related chips are particularly dire but also missed the boat on EV, struggling on renewables, nowhere in smartphones, etc). Yes, there is Arm so that's that (not in the EU).

It’s mutual dependency. The developed and controlled chips can’t be made without EU lithography.

And it doesn’t have to be a bad thing to not exist in AI given all the damage that is done by AI.